Sign in

Executive Dashboard

Where adoption is at risk

Adoption intelligence, the human factors behind it, readiness by population, and the risks that need leadership attention.

Readiness detailOpen Actions

Adoption Signal

76/100+3.6
Measured Adoption Intent

Adoption Readiness

72/100+4.2
WatchModerately ready

Readiness Trajectory

Stable
+3 across the last 4 periods

Open Critical Risks

2
16 risks tracked in the registry

RIDIER Executive Insight

Northwind Group: Moderately ready readiness signal

What we're seeing

PSI observes a current readiness signal of 72, indicating a moderately ready state for the Northwind Group. This score reflects an upward trend over the past weeks, suggesting gradual improvement in readiness for change initiatives.

Why it matters

This pattern may matter for the adoption of new initiatives and the overall workplace experience, as higher trust and leadership confidence can facilitate smoother transitions and enhance employee engagement during change processes.

Recommended focus

Leaders should investigate the factors contributing to the lower scores in Capability and Perceived Loss, as these may impact the overall readiness and acceptance of change initiatives.

Open InsightsGenerated from privacy-thresholded aggregates only

Adoption Intelligence

Where adoption is strong, where it is weakening, and where attention is needed.

Adoption by Project

Active change initiatives, weakest first

Not enough conversations to report yet.

Vendor Consolidation

Pilot · Supply Chain, Finance

Adoption signal

44

Adoption Readiness

vs last period -2.6
55Trend ↑ Improving

Recorded adoption 44% of a 65% target

Critical

CRM Migration

Rollout · Wave 1 · Sales

Adoption signal

57

Adoption Readiness

vs last period +1.4
63Trend ↑ Improving

Recorded adoption 57% of a 80% target

Elevated

Financial Close Automation

Rollout · Wave 2 · Finance

Adoption signal

68

Adoption Readiness

vs last period +2.9
74Trend ↑ Improving

Recorded adoption 68% of a 85% target

Watch

Adoption Projection

Current adoption signal

76

Direction

→ Stable

4-week directional projection

Conditions are holding. If current conditions continue, readiness stays in its current band over the next four weeks.

Directional projection · not a validated prediction. Derived from measured readiness trajectory and adoption signal movement — no probability or likelihood is produced.

Adoption by Department

Ranked from highest risk to strongest

Not enough conversations to report yet.

Operations

167 conversations contributing

Adoption signal

58

Adoption Readiness

vs last period -3.4
54Trend → Stable

Primary pressure: Perceived Loss

Critical

Supply Chain

79 conversations contributing

Adoption signal

62

Adoption Readiness

vs last period -1.8
59Trend → Stable

Primary pressure: Perceived Loss

Critical

Finance

113 conversations contributing

Adoption signal

75

Adoption Readiness

vs last period +2.4
71Trend → Stable

Primary pressure: Change Capacity

Watch

Adoption by Role

Aggregated role populations · anonymous

Frontline Employee

24 conversations contributing

Adoption Signal

55

Readiness

58

Trajectory

↓ Deteriorating

Primary factor: Change Capacity

Individual Contributor

18 conversations contributing

Adoption Signal

70

Readiness

71

Trajectory

→ Stable

Primary factor: Change Capacity

People Manager

12 conversations contributing

Adoption Signal

68

Readiness

66

Trajectory

→ Stable

Primary factor: Change Capacity

Senior Leader

9 conversations contributing

Adoption Signal

82

Readiness

80

Trajectory

→ Stable

Primary factor: Change Capacity

Change Champion

Not enough conversations to report yet.

Other

Not enough conversations to report yet.

Role group is optional and chosen for a single conversation. No employee identity or profile is stored, and every role population must independently meet the reporting threshold of 7 conversations.

Human Signals

The workforce conditions influencing adoption and readiness.

All PSI™ factors

Trust Signal

78+3.1
No comparable history

Trust is holding steady across recent periods.

Single comparable period

Psychological Safety Signal

74+5.4
→ Stable

Psychological Safety is holding steady across recent periods.

Last 4 periods

Adoption Signal

76+3.6
No comparable history

Adoption Intent is holding steady across recent periods.

Single comparable period

Change Capability

64+1.2
No comparable history

Capability is holding steady across recent periods.

Single comparable period

Change Capacity

58-2.0
→ Stable

Change Capacity is low but not moving, so the constraint looks structural rather than recent.

Last 4 periods

Readiness Intelligence

Where people are ready, where readiness is falling behind, and what is driving the gap.

Overall Readiness

Composite readiness and measured movement

72/100Watch
Band
Moderately ready
Trajectory
→ Stable
4-period movement
+3

Readiness by Department

Ranked lowest readiness first

  • Operations54→
  • Supply Chain59→
  • Finance71→
Not enough conversations to report yet.

What's trending

The most meaningful measured movements

  • No factor moved beyond the noise band this period.

Project Readiness Gap

Against each organization-defined target, or the RIDIER healthy readiness benchmark of 78 where none is set · largest gap first

Vendor Consolidation

Primary driver: Change Capacity

RIDIER benchmark

78

Healthy band floor

Current

55

Readiness gap

↑ Improving

-23

CRM Migration

Primary driver: Perceived Loss

Organization target

75

Set by this organization

Current

63

Readiness gap

↑ Improving

-12

Financial Close Automation

Primary driver: Change Capacity

Organization target

80

Set by this organization

Current

74

Readiness gap

↑ Improving

-6

Where an initiative shows “Organization target”, that value was set by this organization. Where it shows “RIDIER benchmark”, no target has been set and the published healthy band floor of 78 is shown for reference only — owners and admins can set a target in Settings.

Risk Registry

Emerging workforce and operational conditions that may threaten adoption or performance.

Response progress

From the status entries leaders have recorded

Risks with a recorded response

38%

16 risks · 0 closed

Addressing 6Monitoring 1Open 9

Full risk dashboard

Impact, action plan and timeline per risk

The risk dashboard shows what each risk is doing to adoption and readiness, the prioritised plan against it, and the recorded history of what was decided.

Open risk dashboard

People Risk

HighPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Organization-wide

Signal
Perceived Loss 52 (higher is worse)
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
5% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Perceived Loss is at 52 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.

Updated Sep 08, 2026

ModeratePeople RiskOpen

Change fatigue and capacity strain

Department · Finance

Signal
Change Capacity 60 · readiness 71
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 71 of 100 in Finance · this factor carries 15% of the composite

Change Capacity is the strongest pressure reported in Finance this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Pause or re-sequence the lowest-priority concurrent initiative for the affected populations.
  2. 2Confirm with delivery leads what business-as-usual work is being displaced.
  3. 3Reset milestone dates to the pace the population can absorb before adding enablement.
ModeratePeople RiskAddressing

Change fatigue and capacity strain

Organization-wide

Signal
Change Capacity 58
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Change Capacity has moved +1 across recent comparable periods.

Action plan

  1. 1Pause or re-sequence the lowest-priority concurrent initiative for the affected populations.
  2. 2Confirm with delivery leads what business-as-usual work is being displaced.
  3. 3Reset milestone dates to the pace the population can absorb before adding enablement.

Owner Transformation Office · Target Oct 02, 2026 · Updated Aug 14, 2026 · Delivery calendar reviewed with the sponsor group; two workstreams re-sequenced.

MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Department · Operations

Signal
Perceived Loss 71 · readiness 54
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 54 of 100 in Operations · this factor carries 5% of the composite

Perceived Loss is the strongest pressure reported in Operations this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.
MonitorPeople RiskMonitoring

Change clarity gap

Organization-wide

Signal
Change Clarity 68
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Change Clarity has moved +3 across recent comparable periods.

Action plan

  1. 1Restate what is changing, what is not, and when, in the language people use.
  2. 2Give each population a single source of truth for the change.
  3. 3Ask managers to confirm where the message is still unclear.
MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

Manager confidence gap

Organization-wide

Signal
Manager Confidence 65
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
10% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Manager Confidence is at 65 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Give managers the answers, decision rights and escalation route they need before the next milestone.
  2. 2Run a short manager forum focused on the questions they cannot currently answer.
  3. 3Check manager confidence again next period before broad workforce communication.

Owner People Team · Target Sep 18, 2026 · Updated Aug 25, 2026 · Manager enablement pack issued ahead of the next milestone.

MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

Capability shortfall

Organization-wide

Signal
Capability 64
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Capability is at 64 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Sequence practical, role-relevant practice ahead of go-live instead of broad training volume.
  2. 2Identify roles with the largest capability gap and support them first.
  3. 3Confirm competence in the real task, not attendance.
MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Department · Supply Chain

Signal
Perceived Loss 64 · readiness 59
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 59 of 100 in Supply Chain · this factor carries 5% of the composite

Perceived Loss is the strongest pressure reported in Supply Chain this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.

Operational Risk

CriticalOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Adoption 57% against a 80% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
23 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 57% against a 80% target

Recorded adoption for CRM Migration is 57% against a target of 80%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
CriticalOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Adoption 44% against a 65% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
21 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 44% against a 65% target

Recorded adoption for Vendor Consolidation is 44% against a target of 65%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
HighOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · Financial Close Automation

Signal
Adoption 68% against a 85% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
17 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 68% against a 85% target

Recorded adoption for Financial Close Automation is 68% against a target of 85%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
HighOperational RiskOpen

Readiness gap against the healthy band

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Readiness 55 against a 78 benchmark
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Vendor Consolidation
Impact on readiness
23 point readiness gap in Pilot

Vendor Consolidation is in Pilot with readiness at 55 of 100.

Action plan

  1. 1Re-sequence the plan to the pace the population can absorb, or reduce concurrent scope.
  2. 2Address the strongest human pressure reported in the populations in scope.
  3. 3Reconfirm readiness before the next milestone gate.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Readiness gap against the healthy band

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Readiness 63 against a 78 benchmark
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against CRM Migration
Impact on readiness
15 point readiness gap in Rollout · Wave 1

CRM Migration is in Rollout · Wave 1 with readiness at 63 of 100.

Action plan

  1. 1Re-sequence the plan to the pace the population can absorb, or reduce concurrent scope.
  2. 2Address the strongest human pressure reported in the populations in scope.
  3. 3Reconfirm readiness before the next milestone gate.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against CRM Migration
Impact on readiness
Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes

Recorded on the CRM Migration initiative: Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · Financial Close Automation

Signal
Month-end overlap compresses training windows
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Financial Close Automation
Impact on readiness
Month-end overlap compresses training windows

Recorded on the Financial Close Automation initiative: Month-end overlap compresses training windows

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Process ownership unclear across two regions
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Vendor Consolidation
Impact on readiness
Process ownership unclear across two regions

Recorded on the Vendor Consolidation initiative: Process ownership unclear across two regions

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.

Every risk is derived from threshold-checked aggregates, recorded organizational context and measured trajectory. No conversation text, individual result or identity is used.