Sign in

Risk

Risk dashboard

What each risk is doing to adoption and readiness, the prioritised plan against it, and how far the response has actually got.

Response progress

Based on the status entries leaders have recorded

Risks with a recorded response

38%

16 risks · 0 closed

Addressing 6Monitoring 1Open 9

Critical, still open

2
Highest severity

High, still open

3
Next in priority

Registry

Derived from threshold-checked aggregates, recorded organizational context and measured trajectory.

People Risk

HighPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Organization-wide

Signal
Perceived Loss 52 (higher is worse)
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
5% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Perceived Loss is at 52 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.

Updated Sep 08, 2026

ModeratePeople RiskOpen

Change fatigue and capacity strain

Department · Finance

Signal
Change Capacity 60 · readiness 71
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 71 of 100 in Finance · this factor carries 15% of the composite

Change Capacity is the strongest pressure reported in Finance this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Pause or re-sequence the lowest-priority concurrent initiative for the affected populations.
  2. 2Confirm with delivery leads what business-as-usual work is being displaced.
  3. 3Reset milestone dates to the pace the population can absorb before adding enablement.
ModeratePeople RiskAddressing

Change fatigue and capacity strain

Organization-wide

Signal
Change Capacity 58
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Change Capacity has moved +1 across recent comparable periods.

Action plan

  1. 1Pause or re-sequence the lowest-priority concurrent initiative for the affected populations.
  2. 2Confirm with delivery leads what business-as-usual work is being displaced.
  3. 3Reset milestone dates to the pace the population can absorb before adding enablement.

Owner Transformation Office · Target Oct 02, 2026 · Updated Aug 14, 2026 · Delivery calendar reviewed with the sponsor group; two workstreams re-sequenced.

MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Department · Operations

Signal
Perceived Loss 71 · readiness 54
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 54 of 100 in Operations · this factor carries 5% of the composite

Perceived Loss is the strongest pressure reported in Operations this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.
MonitorPeople RiskMonitoring

Change clarity gap

Organization-wide

Signal
Change Clarity 68
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Change Clarity has moved +3 across recent comparable periods.

Action plan

  1. 1Restate what is changing, what is not, and when, in the language people use.
  2. 2Give each population a single source of truth for the change.
  3. 3Ask managers to confirm where the message is still unclear.
MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

Manager confidence gap

Organization-wide

Signal
Manager Confidence 65
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
10% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Manager Confidence is at 65 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Give managers the answers, decision rights and escalation route they need before the next milestone.
  2. 2Run a short manager forum focused on the questions they cannot currently answer.
  3. 3Check manager confidence again next period before broad workforce communication.

Owner People Team · Target Sep 18, 2026 · Updated Aug 25, 2026 · Manager enablement pack issued ahead of the next milestone.

MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

Capability shortfall

Organization-wide

Signal
Capability 64
Trajectory
No comparable history
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
15% of the Adoption Readiness composite · organization readiness 72 of 100

Capability is at 64 of 100 this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Sequence practical, role-relevant practice ahead of go-live instead of broad training volume.
  2. 2Identify roles with the largest capability gap and support them first.
  3. 3Confirm competence in the real task, not attendance.
MonitorPeople RiskAddressing

High perceived loss

Department · Supply Chain

Signal
Perceived Loss 64 · readiness 59
Trajectory
→ Stable
Impact on adoption
Reported alongside Adoption Intent at 76 of 100
Impact on readiness
Adoption Readiness 59 of 100 in Supply Chain · this factor carries 5% of the composite

Perceived Loss is the strongest pressure reported in Supply Chain this period.

Action plan

  1. 1Name explicitly what people lose in this change and what replaces it.
  2. 2Address the losses that can be mitigated, and be direct about those that cannot.
  3. 3Re-check perceived loss next period before increasing adoption pressure.

Operational Risk

CriticalOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Adoption 57% against a 80% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
23 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 57% against a 80% target

Recorded adoption for CRM Migration is 57% against a target of 80%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
CriticalOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Adoption 44% against a 65% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
21 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 44% against a 65% target

Recorded adoption for Vendor Consolidation is 44% against a target of 65%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
HighOperational RiskOpen

Adoption below target

Project · Financial Close Automation

Signal
Adoption 68% against a 85% target
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
17 points below the recorded adoption target
Impact on readiness
Adoption 68% against a 85% target

Recorded adoption for Financial Close Automation is 68% against a target of 85%.

Action plan

  1. 1Confirm where usage stalls in the actual workflow before adding further enablement activity.
  2. 2Fix the highest-frequency blocker found in that workflow.
  3. 3Re-check recorded adoption at the next measurement point.
HighOperational RiskOpen

Readiness gap against the healthy band

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Readiness 55 against a 78 benchmark
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Vendor Consolidation
Impact on readiness
23 point readiness gap in Pilot

Vendor Consolidation is in Pilot with readiness at 55 of 100.

Action plan

  1. 1Re-sequence the plan to the pace the population can absorb, or reduce concurrent scope.
  2. 2Address the strongest human pressure reported in the populations in scope.
  3. 3Reconfirm readiness before the next milestone gate.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Readiness gap against the healthy band

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Readiness 63 against a 78 benchmark
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against CRM Migration
Impact on readiness
15 point readiness gap in Rollout · Wave 1

CRM Migration is in Rollout · Wave 1 with readiness at 63 of 100.

Action plan

  1. 1Re-sequence the plan to the pace the population can absorb, or reduce concurrent scope.
  2. 2Address the strongest human pressure reported in the populations in scope.
  3. 3Reconfirm readiness before the next milestone gate.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · CRM Migration

Signal
Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against CRM Migration
Impact on readiness
Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes

Recorded on the CRM Migration initiative: Field reps unsure how quota reporting changes

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · Financial Close Automation

Signal
Month-end overlap compresses training windows
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Financial Close Automation
Impact on readiness
Month-end overlap compresses training windows

Recorded on the Financial Close Automation initiative: Month-end overlap compresses training windows

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.
ModerateOperational RiskOpen

Recorded implementation constraint

Project · Vendor Consolidation

Signal
Process ownership unclear across two regions
Trajectory
↑ Improving
Impact on adoption
Recorded against Vendor Consolidation
Impact on readiness
Process ownership unclear across two regions

Recorded on the Vendor Consolidation initiative: Process ownership unclear across two regions

Action plan

  1. 1Assign a named owner and a resolution date to this constraint.
  2. 2Escalate to the sponsor group if the date cannot be met.
  3. 3Record the resolution against the initiative.

Risks, impact and action plans are built from aggregate results only. No conversation text, individual result or identity is used anywhere on this page, and status entries are append-only so the timeline stays a true record.